Norway

Do we have them for other wc teams?

mastercyb napisał:

Do we have them for other wc teams?

Rather not... :(

Norway is next, how do we win against them?

550 or 451 PC, PIC, def trainer

11.06.2010
Norway :

18:14 22 players neutral coach

19:16 22 pl + neutral

19:29 22 pl + neutral

19:40 22 pl + def coach

19:44 22 pl + neutral coach (changed to the 1rst one)

Bosnia :

18:22 20 pl + off coach

19:17 21 pl + off

19:28 21 pl + off

19:33 24 players + neutral coach (change!)

19:44 26 players + neutral

1. Do you guys think Norway will play pic or normal..and why?

2. Do you think they will play aow or aim?

I got a lot of ideas. ;)

At the beginning I think about CA.

5-3-2:
WBn-CDtw-CD(Sowul)-CDtw-WBn
WGoff-IMtw(or IMdef)-WGoff
FWtw-FWtw

Def or neutral coach, PiC

5-2-3:
WBn-CDtw-CD(Sowul)-CDtw-WBn
WGoff-WGoff
FWtw-FW-FWtw

Def or neutral coach, PiC

4-4-2:

WBdef-CD-CD-WBdef
WGoff-IMtw-IMtw-WGoff
FWtw-FWtw

Def or neutral coach, PiC

4-3-3:
WBn-CD-CD-WBdef
WGoff-IMtw-WGoff
FWtw-FWtw

Def or neutral coach, PiC

Furthermore we could use FWdef instead of FWtw and we shouldn`t worry about confusion. Our middlefield will be very low...

Secondly, we could play 3-5-2 or 4-5-1 and focus on one strong attack (AoW or AIM).

Thirdly, they specialities don`t impress. Playing creatively is a big risk, but it could overcome loss in possession and ensure the promotion to the next round. I know that you don`t like this tactic, but it is only easy offer.

5-5-0 and 4-5-1 with increasing middlefield and def coach also sounds good.

Generally it is a little bit difficult to invent good tactic with PiC... :/

What about Bednarz contusion?

mastercyb napisał:

1. Do you guys think Norway will play pic or normal..and why?

2. Do you think they will play aow or aim?

1. Zagrają PIC, bo:
- są przekonani, że my zagramy PIC,
- są przekonani, że ich pomoc jest lepsza niż nasza,
- są przekonani, że zagramy obronnie,
- chcą osiągnąć medal ze swoją drużyną,
- nawet jak stracą punkt(y), to powinni wygrać ostatni mecz.

2. Zagrają aim, bo:
- jeśli zagrają PIC, to mogą zagrac Wtm

3. A co jeśli zagrają 523 CA? >Norge - Island

It's not nice that Bednarz got injured, but it's not worth investing 255 doctors in him, as there is only one update before the game. Maybe we are lucky and he recovers with 10 doctors, if not we'll have to find a way to win without him.

I don't like the idea of playing CA. Norway has decent specialties too(especially if they play offensively) and also it is a tactic that I want to keep for special occasions. Anyway, before deciding what tactic we want to use we should try to anticipate how they're playing...

I thnik that they will play PiC. Norwegians are aware of our strength and weakness of other teams in our group. Do you think about bilateral PiC?

I estimete their middlefield and the result is (3xIM + WGtm):
- passable (low) with PiC
- solid (low) or passable (high) with normal (it depends on FWdef or CDoff)
MoTS is not an option so it does not make sense to evaluate it.

Generally "concrete" (4-5-1, 5-5-0) and 4-5-1 with AoW sounds best.

I'm not doing pic deals, if we both play pic it will be because both coaches decide so:). I actually turned down a Mexico pic deal, for both: I don't do them, I expected them to play normal anyway:).

As far as today's game is concerned, we have to be careful at the weather too... We could again go for an aim, or maybe for something more defensive.. Still evaluting all our options...

Top_Gear napisał:

I thnik that they will play PiC. Norwegians are aware of our strength and weakness of other teams in our group. Do you think about bilateral PiC?

I estimete their middlefield and the result is (3xIM + WGtm):
- passable (low) with PiC
- solid (low) or passable (high) with normal (it depends on FWdef or CDoff)
MoTS is not an option so it does not make sense to evaluate it.

Generally "concrete" (4-5-1, 5-5-0) and 4-5-1 with AoW sounds best.