 |
| Pią 7:36, 18 Cze 2010 |
| 67 |
| 2820 |
|
|
Planning, I'd assume probably the worst-case scenario with them playing 4-5-1 MOTS using 2 x WTM + DF or 3-5-2 MOTS using 2 x WTM + 2 x normal forward. The basic question then is how much would we nee ...
|
| Śro 21:35, 10 Mar 2010 |
| 77 |
| 2190 |
|
|
PIN sounds most logical to me, at least unless you go for something like 4-3-3 CA. Which might be not so bad idea.
|
| Śro 8:44, 10 Mar 2010 |
| 77 |
| 2190 |
|
|
Thanks. Rough rating estimations below.
1) 3-5-2: 1-1-1 defence, 4 normal inners, OW, off coach
defences: formidable(high)-outstanding(low)
attacks: weak, formidable(low-high), outstanding(low)
...
|
| Śro 0:57, 10 Mar 2010 |
| 77 |
| 2190 |
|
|
They PINned, right?
|
| Wto 22:38, 09 Mar 2010 |
| 77 |
| 2190 |
|
|
Which coach (attacking or neutral) did they use vs Hongkong? What was their team confidence?
Kind of info that would be useful to estimate their possible ratings on Friday.
|
| Czw 9:01, 11 Lut 2010 |
| 47 |
| 1716 |
|
|
Much depends on your decision on PIC or PIN. If PICing 4-4-2 CA with 4 inners and OW + def/neutral coach looks most attractive to me, although their decent SPer is bit worrying.
If PIN, then most ob ...
|
| Pią 9:01, 05 Lut 2010 |
| 63 |
| 1845 |
|
|
Maybe like this:
http://yfrog.com/5i02051p
switching to below one if leading by more than two
http://yfrog.com/1302052p (ratings with pullback effect included)
|
| Pią 16:13, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
Yes, so depending on the choice of tactics and what we expect from the opponent, one has to decide whether it improves a tiny bit the defence or the midfield.
Most of the time I prefer to improve t ...
|
| Pią 16:03, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
Illustrating CD/offCD point. As far as HO can be treated as reliable (shouldn't be far off in CD/offCD contributions):
1.
Witomski
Sowul(def)--Jaroszek--Bednarz(xF)--Basta
Szot(xIM)--Sozańs ...
|
| Pią 15:37, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
As for offCD, if you want to put inner with some PM there, it might be worth to consider normal order. Gain in MF due to using offensive one is really tiny - roughly 1/10 of normal inner contribution.
|
| Pią 15:35, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
I'm confused. Wouldn't be easier to put Mokrzycki as eim from cd position and Bednarz as fw?
Not if you would like to have Mokrzycki still on the pitch. For two reasons:
- XP
- midfield (as DF)
|
| Pią 14:58, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
Roger that. Reasonable (imo) alternative to previous 3-4-3 if you don't feel secure about midfield
http://yfrog.com/1329ap
Mokrzycki and Bednarz are prone to weather event, but we cannot do anything ...
|
| Pią 14:25, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
@mastercyb
As for the 17 yo, it's obviously up to you to judge. The facts are like this:
- since 5 or 6 terms every Polish U-20 coach and NT-coach try to give as much XP as possible to the future U- ...
|
| Pią 9:56, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
As for the lineup, I think myamlak's proposal is nearly perfect. I'd change one thing: field Szot instead of Banaszczyk. He gives a little more to attack and the game will be played in rain, negativ ...
|
| Pią 7:18, 29 Sty 2010 |
| 42 |
| 1038 |
|
|
If midfield is high enough to have no risk then I'd go for sth like:
http://yfrog.com/5j82301750p
|
| Strona 1 z 32 |
Wszystkie czasy w strefie CET (Europa) |
| |
